Here we go again, Russia, Russia , Russia. Schiff and the Pied Piper , Nancy Pelosi leading Democrats to accuse the President of allowing Russia to interfere in our elections again. They conveniently forget that Obama and Loretta Lynch telling the intel community to stand down when it was found they were interfering . Please give the country a rest from your hateful reporting. Making Russia more important than they are.

Joe pronounces the name of my state incorrectly. It is pronounced ne-vad-uh, NOT ne-vah-duh.

Very disappointed in the 2/19/20 debates format. MSNBC is adding to decisive chaos among the democratic party. Rather than asking gotcha questions, why don't you ask Policy Questions and let us really learn about the candidates. You are helping to get Donald Trump re-elected. Stop with the sensational approach, dump Chuch Todd and ask questions that help voters make a solid and responsible choice rather than turning the debates into a circus. Shame on you all. Journalism can help divide or save the country. What's it going to be? We are counting on you!

You contributor pundits keep complaining why debaters didn’t mention certain topics but your moderators asked specific controversial questions that put them on the defensive and only gave them 90 seconds to respond and moderators admonished them if they didn’t answer. You can’t have it all ways.

I have read with great interest the comments regarding the recent debate and the "inadequacies" seen on MSNBC coverage. I agree, on the whole, with many of the critiques - including the unequal amount of time given to some candidates, the lack of substantive questions on policy, and the baiting of the candidates into unnecessary quarrels probably for ratings. The debate last night was such an important one for the sake of our nation, and the only "winner" was Trump.The questioners could have easily structured the questions and answers into other directions and away from the "dog fight" which they seemed to relish. And while I am at this, I may just as well comment on the pre and post shows. MSNBC seems to love the fast-talking, fact-spewing, ranting guests (and hosts) who have never had a lesson in self-editing or voice control. If you want to hear a great speaker who knows how to communicate meaningfully and is an expert in her field then pay attention to Myra Wiley. Nicole Wallace, Rachel Maddow and Claire McCaskill are other good examples. In many cases, I have either turned off the channel or the TV. I don't know what MSNBC's goal is in news presentation, but the powers that control it need to critically listen to their own network and consider some replacements. I might start with … well, I'll leave that for another feedback.

Why did the moderators give Warren and Sanders so much time to talk and cut off Bloomberg Biden and Buttigieg very unfair. Less questions and more time for answers. After awhile I had to turn off sound on Sanders and Warren so loud.

Shame on both CNN and MSNBC debate moderators. I am disillusioned and frustrated by the questions posed to candidates which seem aimed more toward promoting a TV reality show than a debate about issues and policies among presidential candidates. Where are the questions about foreign policy, economic growth and development, infrastructure, health care, capitalism vs socialism, quality of life issues, etc. Where are the questions that elicit candidates' experience and thinking on how they would actually govern and interact with world leaders…not questions about how much money they have or whose name they forgot, or how they can attack a fellow candidate personally. These debtes are a circus. Are we electing a president and leader of the free world, or the captain of a debating team? Leading and debating are not the same or equal skills. We already have a president who bullied his way through debates to become our disfunctional leader - Lord help us. We don't need another embarrassment in the White House. We need a president who can administer the government, understand issues and policies, be respected on the world stage, and serve in the best interests of the American people. Get serious and stop trying to improve your ratings at the expense of the American electorate"s ability to chose the best candidate to defeat Trump!

The moderators for the debate are doing a poor job of controlling the debate and providing ample time to ALL the candidates. Plus, it felt like the moderators fomented the back biting across the candidates which is counterproductive to fighting the President and provides him with ammunition to fight the candidates. Very disappointed with MSNBC.

as a retired television engineer with 30 plus years experience in the broadcast industry, you really need to do something about the lip sync problem on the democratic debate. As the brain surgeon said, this isn’t tv you know. Fix it.

I am sick of the Democratic debate tonight. The anchors are giving Sanders all the time or he is coopting the time from you. Warren is silly. If Trump was not in the White House, this would not be so serious. But, it is and I do not see a winner tonight. I am a Democrat and I am embarrassed. Who is winning? None of them. Sanders cannot in, Warren has blown it, Biden is too timid and acts old and not very witty, That leaves Bloomberg, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar. Can they win? I do not know, but they are the only real people on that damn stage,

I pay $30 a month to access SlingTV with the news option and have been doing so for years. The only thing I watch on Sling is MSNBC. It is becoming increasingly difficult to justify this expense when considering where MSNBC seems to be heading in its news philosophy. Seems to be more and more an arm of the corporate Democratic wing of the party. More and more guests seem jaded and some I previously respected seem to be tempering their views. While the country is threatened with the demise of the Republic, MSNBC seems to be committed to the status quo, as if that is what's best. Chris Mathews is beyond a joke. Why is he even still part of this network with his own show? The ridiculous comments spewing forth from his mouth are essentially the equivalent of Fox News misinformation. He's an embarrassment to the station. Keep it up and I will be saying goodbye to Sling and MSNBC.

Why is it always Mayor Pete but never Senator Amy? Bias K think.

Chris Mathews is so anti Sanders that he is an embarrassment. His musings are nonsensical and his politics same same old news. He defends the status quo with no sympathy for the inequities the status quo have produced. He is old news.

Chris Mathews is so anti Sanders that he is an embarrassment. His musings are nonsensical and his politics same same old news. He defends the status quo with no sympathy for the inequities the status quo have produced. He is old news.

Networks and news media outlets like MSNBC are respected because they are largely rates as being based on information that has been or is corroborated by others who seek the facts.

Rick Wilson is a often brought on as a guest political commentator. The problem is that Wilson is a right wing conservative who's only saving grace on a network like MSNBC is his high level of dislike and vitriol about Trump and Trumpublicans. And that is all that Rick Wilson should speak about with any validity.

This evening 2/1/200 he was on the "11th hour with Brian". First, I need to say that Brian Williams is full of nonsense as he attempts to give any reasoned critique of the Democratic party, and especially about the various great Democratic candidates seeking to win the Presidency.

Back to Rick Wilson. Yet again Williams allows Wilson to promote his right wing conservative spiels with his new book, with an insulting name that partially reads, "A plot to save America from Trump - And Democrats from themselves." Are you freaking kidding me Williams? You bring Wilson on to give us "answers" about his views regarding Obama's thoughts on the current Democratic primary, cited from the New York piece?

Wilson not only thinks that Democrats need help, to protect them for themselves, but he also believes that it is he, Wilson, who is going to help Democrats by giving them advice on what to do and what not to do. Hey Wilson, if you're so damn smart as to what any party needs to do and not do in order to elect the "correct" candidate, then you and your Republican fellow pundits miserably FAILED at not getting Trump elected. So, with that FACT, you need to largely ignored about anything to do with what Democrats should or should not do.

In his spiel, with Williams staying quiet, Wilson ends his ridiculousness filled diatribe on why Democrats would fail if Bernie Sanders were to be the Democratic nominee. Wilson has the gall to lecture Democratic voters and the DNC, that if they want to keep the house and win back the Senate, then don't elect Bernie. Wilson keeps claiming that Republicans are happy and rolling with laughter that they WANT Sanders to be the Democratic nominee because, due to some unproven and fact-less based omniscience, Wilson claims that Trump would be reelected if Sanders is the nominee. And Williams just sits there quietly without challenging Rick Wilson to explain how his opinions have any validity considering that poll after poll after poll keep showing that ANY of the Democratic candidates still in the race, will beat Trump in a general election.

That is a very major problem that too many MSNBC guests and contributors are allowed to twist, spin, and spew on an otherwise great network. The tiresome and constantly harped, "Electability problem" is a massive red herring, That baseless and fact-less constant assertion has been driven into the Democrat discussion by RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVE pundits like Rick Wilson. The who spiel about some imaginary electability problems that the Democrats have, is a right wing tactic that has succeeded into sucking some MSNBC hosts into promoting it as some legitimate issue. And many other otherwise balanced news media outlets have also been sucked into that idiocy.

Again, poll after pole after poll show that every current Democratic candidate beats Trump in the general election. In fact, MSNBC and others like it, have shown and talked about those very polls. So it's astounding that the very networks that show those polls choose to ignore those facts, and instead choose to promote a tired and old right wing talking point, and even have right wing conservative pundits actually promoting that right wing propaganda on MSNBC! The mind reels as to what in the world your some of your hosts are drinking.

Democratic American citizens darn well know if the candidates they are voting for are worth their vote, the OF COURSE they also think that candidate can beat Trump. Do some of your hosts and guests think that Democrats are really just playing a silly game and cast their votes for a candidate they know can't win!? That the logical idiocy being promoted by some of your hosts like Brian Williams and Chris Matthews. This constant attempt at shaming Democratic voters as to why they are voting for candidates like Sanders or Warren is counterproductive and only aids in driving the nonsense of "electability" as if it were something that Democratic voters are really worried about. If that were true, then why is Sanders still leading and is polling as the leader in every upcoming primary and caucus? Report the truth and the facts, and turn down the personal political views of hosts who simply don't like a candidate like Sanders or Warren. Bloomberg hasn't even been in a single debate, and yet some MSNBC hosts give him such praise and talk about him as if he is some front runner who has chalked up some winning primaries. Bloomberg hasn't even been properly vetted on a debate stage.

The candidate who has the real electability problem is Trump. How that eludes so called "left leaning" MSNBC hosts is astounding. Trump's ratings are constantly being reported as some of the lowest in history for a President seeking a second term. Even your own network showcases stories about how even Trump voters in 2016 have seen that they made a bad choice and will not be voting for Trump's reelection. And yet, instead of showing Trump's very own re-electability, some of your hosts keep harping and spreading the right wing misinformation that it is the Democratic candidates who have an electability problem. Get real. Get the facts. And get the story straight. That is what the public wants and expects from news outlets such as MSNBC.

The last several days of watching MSNBC has been as disturbing as when watching the 2016 presidential election. MSNBC is obviously so desperate for ratings and or salacious information, you will tear down Democrats running for president. MSNBC did that to Hillary C, with non stop coverage of an investigation being open by FBI in late 2016, which of course didn't go anywhere, but contributed to costing her the election. Now you are running non stop coverage of Michael Bloomberg allegations. The one thing you can say about FOX, which I hate, is they never tear down Republicans. I was a loyal viewer of MSNBC, but my viewership has diminished greatly, which I am sure has happened for others. Maybe you just want Trump to win again, so you will have something to report every day, for ratings sake. We know where FOX loyalties lie; where do yours?

after all the backlash against andrew zimmern for his comments against chinese restaurants and his cultural appropriation, his his new show on msnbc a way to rehabilitate his image? Doesnt it beggar belief that he has any credibility to discuss issues about immigrants and the food industry given his comments and now attempt to palm off his new restaurant venture as authentic?

Socialism , this ideology has cost tens of millions of lives , just read how Mao, Stalin, Chavez, Castro for examples. But Bernie is a Democrat Socialist really?The only reason he uses Democrat is he is running as a Democrat. Wake up people especially when you hear free healthcare, free tuition, and free to lose everything you have pertaining to Liberty, Freedom. Be careful what you ask for, there is always a price to pay.

2/14 Watching (streaming) Morning Joe this Valentines Day and am amazed that the writers can't write, at least with grammatical correctness.
Misplaced modifiers, Mika reading stuff about the Roger Stone lead juror. Take a look: it be wrong and ungrammatical. I guess that's what we've come to in the .com electronic era.
Example: As a journalism major, I wanted to puke when I heard what Mika spewed. Introductory phrase here is a modifier, describing what follows. As such, "I" am the subject directly following the modifier.
Sad statement of affairs.
Joe, Mika, producers: have some pride. Your not really news (you're commentators), but please get it right.

Thanks, had to vent.
Shannon May
208 920-9421

Democrats continue to cite “rule of law” what a laugh. Where were they through Fast and Furious, Social Security Scandal, Benghazi, Hillarys obstruction of Justice??????